United States v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad
Citations
- 123 U.S. 113
- 8 S. Ct. 77
- 31 L. Ed. 138
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2157
Syllabus
<p>ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.</p> <p>At a trial by jury in a court of the United States, the judge may express to the jury his opinion upon questions of fact winch ho submits to tlicir determination.</p> <p>A claim of the United States against a railroad corporation for taxes on undivided profits during a certain period was, after full examination of the books of the corporation by officers of the government, and argument before the assessor of internal revenue for the district, settled and adjusted by agreement between the assessor and the corporation at' a certain sum, which the corporation paid and took the collector’s receipt for. Nearly twelve years afterwards, an internal revenue agent made another examination of the books of the corporation, resulting, as lie testified, in charging it with a further sum for taxes during the same period. Tn a suit to recover this sum, the judge, in charging the jury, told them that the first assessment, the payment of money in pursuance of it, and the acquiescence of the government for so long a time since, raised a presumption that the assessment was correct, and that the money paid covered the defendant’^ entire liability; that the burden was thus cast upon the government of proving, by such evidence as to fully satisfy the mind, that the assessment was erroneous; that whether it had done so was for the jury to determine, and that, the'judge did not desire to control their finding, but was of .opinion that under the circumstances they should not return a verdict for'the government. Held, no error.</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.