· 11/20/1952
Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
Citations
- 108 F. Supp. 845
- 95 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 264
- 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- distinguishing the trademarked product “Q-Tips” from the descriptive term for the type of goods “double tipped applicator”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.