D. New Jersey· 11/20/1952
Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
Citations
- 108 F. Supp. 845
- 95 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 264
- 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- concluding that “medical swab” and “cotton-tipped applicator” are efficient alternatives for Q-Tips
- distinguishing the trademarked product “Q-Tips” from the descriptive term for the type of goods “double tipped applicator”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Aladdin Industries, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1963-07-11· cited 109×
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Third Circuit· 1953-10-26· cited 106×
- David Elliott v. Google Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2017-05-16· cited 28×
- Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1958-05-07· cited 26×
- Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc.S.D. New York· 1974-08-08· cited 25×
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Third Circuit· 1953-11-13· cited 14×
- Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.M.D. Louisiana· 1984-04-11· cited 12×
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. American Cyanamid Co.D. New Jersey· 1973-07-30· cited 9×
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Dura Electric Lamp Co.D. New Jersey· 1956-08-29· cited 6×
- A. Smith Bowman Distillery, Inc. v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.D. Delaware· 1962-03-29· cited 4×
- Elliot v. Google Inc.D. Arizona· 2014-09-11· cited 3×
- Norsan Products, Inc. v. R. F. Schuele Corp.E.D. Wisconsin· 1968-06-28· cited 3×
- Udin v. J. Kaufman Iron Works, Inc.S.D. New York· 1972-04-10· cited 2×
- David Elliott v. Google Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2017-06-14
- American Personnel, Inc. v. Management Recruiters of Richmond, Inc.Richmond City Circuit Court· 1970-03-10
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 1,620×
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court· 1951-01-08· cited 1,146×
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 381×
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court· 1947-04-28· cited 258×
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court· 1924-06-09· cited 246×
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiNinth Circuit· 1948-02-18· cited 210×
- Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co.S.D. New York· 1921-04-14· cited 168×
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1920-12-06· cited 144×
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court· 1921-11-07· cited 125×
- DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Second Circuit· 1936-07-17· cited 98×
- Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Third Circuit· 1952-09-09· cited 83×
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court· 1936-10-21· cited 81×
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court· 1916-02-21· cited 73×
- Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. R. M. Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 50×
- Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co.Seventh Circuit· 1930-12-04· cited 37×
- House of Westmore, Inc. v. DenneyThird Circuit· 1945-08-21· cited 33×
- W. G. Reardon Laboratories, Inc. v. B. & B. Exterminators, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1934-06-11· cited 32×
- Pro-Phy-Lac-Tic Brush Co. v. Jordan Marsh Co.First Circuit· 1948-01-14· cited 28×
- Pennsylvania R. v. Erie R.E.D. New York· 1933-03-17· cited 25×
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. CoThird Circuit· 1950-01-31· cited 22×
Other cases named Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.