Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/28/1938

Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

Citations

  • 303 U.S. 545
  • 58 S. Ct. 662
  • 82 L. Ed. 1008
  • 1938 U.S. LEXIS 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • combination not patentable if the elements “produce no new or different function or operation than that theretofore performed or produced by them”
  • combination not patentable if the elements \produce no new or different function or operation than that theretofore performed or produced by them\
  • “If this [new feature] were so vital an element ... it is strange that all mention of it was omitted [in the specification].”
  • \If this [new feature] were so vital an element ... it is strange that all mention of it was omitted [in the specification].\
  • “If this were so vital an element in the functioning of the apparatus, it is strange that all mention of it was omitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Hughes, Cardozo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.