Supreme Court· 3/28/1938
Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.
Citations
- 303 U.S. 545
- 58 S. Ct. 662
- 82 L. Ed. 1008
- 1938 U.S. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- combination not patentable if the elements “produce no new or different function or operation than that theretofore performed or produced by them”
- combination not patentable if the elements \produce no new or different function or operation than that theretofore performed or produced by them\
- “If this [new feature] were so vital an element ... it is strange that all mention of it was omitted [in the specification].”
- \If this [new feature] were so vital an element ... it is strange that all mention of it was omitted [in the specification].\
- “If this were so vital an element in the functioning of the apparatus, it is strange that all mention of it was omitted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Hughes, Cardozo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.