Skip to main content
· 2/21/1916

Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.

Citations

  • 240 U.S. 179
  • 36 S. Ct. 288
  • 60 L. Ed. 590
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1440

Syllabus

<p>While one using an unregistered design similar to that-adopted earlier by another may be enjoined from further use thereof, he may not be charged with profits' if it appear that the original imitation -was unintentional, that no deceit or substitution of goods was accomplished in fact,' and that no considerable part of the business was due to his goods being supposed to be those of. the earlier user of the design. .</p> <p>One innocently adopting an unregistered design and continuing to use the same after notice., not for the purpose of stealing the good will of the earlier user but of preserving his own. business, held, in this case, not to be charged with profits not shown to have been obtained by sales of articles supposed to be' those of the earlier user.</p> <p>Relief for unfair competition not given, as the supposed unfairness consisted mainly in the use of a device thát the earlier user sought ■ to have registered but was refused.</p> <p>215 Fed. Rep, 361,' reversed in part. .</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he defendants’ persistence in their use of the design after notice proves little or nothing against them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, McKenna, Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.