Pulley v. KPMG Consulting, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that placement on a PIP was not an adverse employment, action where the PIP did not “adversely alter the conditions of [the plaintiffs] employment”
• plaintiff employee failed to establish retaliation claim where temporal proximity was the only evidence of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).