Skip to main content

Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp.

Citations

  • 417 So. 2d 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[N]on-jurisdictional and non-prejudicial defects in the notice or other steps in the appellate process are not grounds for dismissal.\
  • “[I]t has been repeatedly held on these very facts that a notice which improperly specifies a non-appealable order denying post-trial motions is to be treated as correctly directed to the reviewable final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, C.J., and Barkdull, Hendry, Schwartz, Nesbitt, Baskin, Daniel S. Pearson, Ferguson and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.