· 9/28/1982
SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.
Citations
- 421 So. 2d 562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact that plaintiff's counsel was laggard and slothful in answering interrogatories did not warrant extreme sanction of dismissal of plaintiff's action
- fact that plaintiff's counsel was laggard and slothful in answering interrogatories did not warrant extreme sanction of dismissal of plaintiff's action
- inadequate interrogatory responses do not support dismissal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, Nesbitt and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.