Skip to main content
· 9/28/1982

SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.

Citations

  • 421 So. 2d 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact that plaintiff's counsel was laggard and slothful in answering interrogatories did not warrant extreme sanction of dismissal of plaintiff's action
  • fact that plaintiff's counsel was laggard and slothful in answering interrogatories did not warrant extreme sanction of dismissal of plaintiff's action
  • inadequate interrogatory responses do not support dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.