Gries Inv. Co. v. Chelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that trial court was without jurisdiction to consider motion for leave to amend complaint when plaintiff did not timely appeal or seek rehearing following dismissal without prejudice
• where dismissal deemed an adjudication on the merits by rule 1.420(b), Fla. R. Civ. P., it was final appealable order
• “An order granting a motion to dismiss is not final and not appealable. We reject [Appellant’s] contention that the addition of the words ‘with prejudice’ makes the order final.”
• “An order granting a motion to dismiss is not final and not appealable. We reject [Appellant’s] contention that the addition of the words ‘with prejudice’ makes the order final.”
• \An order granting a motion to dismiss is not final and not appealable.\
• “An order granting a motion to dismiss is not final and not appealable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).