Pub Svc Cmsn Cm KY v. FERC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “more than second-guessing close judgment calls is required to show that a rate order is arbitrary and capricious” (citation omitted)
• holding that “more than second-guessing close judgment calls is required to show that a rate order is arbitrary and capricious” (citation omitted)
• concluding that the Commission violated petitioners’ due process rights when it adopted a rate premium sua sponte and without evidence in the record
• explaining that FERC must provide parties with adequate notice of the issues to be decided
• noting that the Due Process Clause, the Administrative Procedures Act, and the Federal Power Act all require the Commission to provide notice
• “The Commission must . . . respond meaningfully to the arguments raised before it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).