Fanduel, Inc. v. Interactive Games LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicat- ing that expert testimony is not required for the Board to make factual findings based on its view of the record
• indicat- ing that expert testimony is not required for the Board to make factual findings based on its view of the record
• “[I]n every case, it remains the Board’s essential function to make factual findings based on its view of the record.”
• “the burden of proving invalidity in an IPR re- mains on the petitioner throughout the proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2023-10-16· cited 31×
• Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2023-06-12· cited 7×
• Medytox, Inc. v. Galderma S.A.
  Federal Circuit· 2023-06-27· cited 7×
• Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2023-08-07
• Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2025-09-23

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
• KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
• SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu
  Supreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 339×
• Wyers v. Master Lock Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 165×
• Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2015-11-05· cited 144×
• Trivascular, Inc. v. Samuels
  Federal Circuit· 2016-02-05· cited 55×
• Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2016-02-10· cited 52×
• Sas Institute, Inc. v. Complementsoft, LLC.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 43×
• E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Synvina C.V.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-09-17· cited 41×
• Genzyme Therapeutic Products Ltd. Partnership v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-06-14· cited 40×
• In re Zurko
  Federal Circuit· 2001-08-02· cited 39×
• Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. National Graphics, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-09-04· cited 38×
• In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-11-09· cited 33×
• Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-03-15· cited 27×
• Pub Svc Cmsn Cm KY v. FERC
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-02-18· cited 26×
• Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. F'real Foods, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2018-11-16· cited 26×
• Sirona Dental Sys. GMBH v. Institut Straumann AG, Dental Wings Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-06-19· cited 21×
• Rovalma, S.A. v. Bohler-Edelstahl Gmbh & Co. Kg
  Federal Circuit· 2017-05-11· cited 17×
• Crfd Research, Inc. v. Matal
  Federal Circuit· 2017-12-05· cited 17×
• Nike, Inc. v. Adidas Ag
  Federal Circuit· 2020-04-09· cited 15×