· 8/6/1996
Association of Oil Pipe Lines v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership, L.P., Intervenors
Citations
- 83 F.3d 1424
- 317 U.S. App. D.C. 376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An agency is free to adjust or abandon its proposals in light of public comments or internal agency reconsideration without having to start another round of rulemaking.”
- “Because the subject of our scrutiny is a ratemaking—and thus an agency decision involving complex industry analyses and difficult policy choices—the court will be particularly deferential to the Commission’s expertise.”
- skewed data distribution required outlier elimination to avoid windfall profits to many oil pipelines
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.