Skip to main content
· 8/6/1996

Association of Oil Pipe Lines v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership, L.P., Intervenors

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 1424
  • 317 U.S. App. D.C. 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An agency is free to adjust or abandon its proposals in light of public comments or internal agency reconsideration without having to start another round of rulemaking.”
  • “Because the subject of our scrutiny is a ratemaking—and thus an agency decision involving complex industry analyses and difficult policy choices—the court will be particularly deferential to the Commission’s expertise.”
  • skewed data distribution required outlier elimination to avoid windfall profits to many oil pipelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.