Skip to main content
M.D. Pennsylvania· 3/28/2014

Prukala v. Elle

Citations

  • 11 F. Supp. 3d 443
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41887
  • 2014 WL 1311125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘Pennsylvania courts have not . . . recognized a separate tort of harassment.’” (quoting DeAngelo v. Fortney, 357 Pa.Super. 127, 132, 515 A.2d 594, 596 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caputo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.