Pruitt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s attempt to impeach defendant during cross-examination that “clearly and inexcusably violated [the mies of evidence]” justified mistrial, but did not bar retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-04-15· cited 33×
• Brandon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-10-02· cited 20×
• Gustafson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-06-18· cited 19×
• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-01-11· cited 19×
• State v. Joseph
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-10-20· cited 11×
• Ambrose v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-12-18· cited 3×
• Robinson v. Com.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-24· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Tyler
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
• State v. Glass
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 208×
• Moore v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-07-09· cited 175×
• Ransom v. Haner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1961-05-16· cited 121×
• Wright v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 89×
• Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. Gomes
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 46×
• Roth v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-04-16· cited 46×
• Muller v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-01-07· cited 40×
• Anderson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1968-03-08· cited 33×
• Ingram v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-07-19· cited 30×
• State v. Pete
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 28×
• McBeth v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-08· cited 11×
• Ingram v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1986-05-30· cited 9×
• Fox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-02-21· cited 4×