Skip to main content

Robinson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 17 Va. App. 551
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 798
  • 439 S.E.2d 622
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 3
  • 1994 WL 4652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that by having original trial judge hear double jeopardy argument better enabled judge to properly consider strength of Commonwealth’s case at first trial and determine issues of credibility
  • noting that by having original trial judge hear double jeopardy argument better enabled judge to properly consider strength of Commonwealth's case at first trial and determine issues of credibility
  • upholding the circuit court’s factual finding that the prosecutor’s “injecting [of] clearly improper issues at the first trial” was “highly improper,” but, “[w]ithout the requisite intent,” even “gross prosecutorial misconduct” does not bar retrial of a defendant
  • “Without the requisite intent, ... gross prosecutorial misconduct will not satisfy the exception set forth in Kennedy”
  • “Without the requisite intent ... gross prosecutorial misconduct will not satisfy the exception set forth in Kennedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.