Pruiss v. Bosse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying leave to amend to include “new instances of defamation” where the content of the statements was the same, but the new instance named a new party and new dates
• “An amendment will not relate back if it sets forth a new set of operational facts; it can only make more specific what has already been alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jewell v. NYP Holdings, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1998-10-01· cited 52×
• Cerasani v. Sony Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1998-01-15· cited 22×
• Gainsburg v. Steben & Co.
  D. Maryland· 2011-12-08· cited 18×
• Heaning v. NYNEX-New York
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-12· cited 11×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schiavone v. Fortune
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 857×
• Jerome Rosenberg v. Raymond v. Martin
  Second Circuit· 1973-04-27· cited 189×
• Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa Barbara
  N.D. New York· 1977-11-07· cited 74×
• Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co.
  S.D. New York· 1987-07-10· cited 42×
• Barber v. Daly
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-07-23· cited 22×
• Rickman v. Cone Mills Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1989-12-12· cited 11×