Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding relation-back doctrine applied to additional allegedly libelous statements from the same article that formed the basis of the original complaint
• one publication of several similar libelous statements found to be a single transaction for amendment purposes
• no actual malice where defendant “made an attempt to report plaintiffs’ side of the story”
• “Rule 56(f) is not a license for a fishing expedition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).