Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 153 So. 3d 399
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20571
  • 2014 WL 7183249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of postconviction relief because the appellant “re-assert[ed] nine of the grounds he raised at the trial level and repeat[ed] the arguments he made in the circuit court” without referencing “any error or insufficiency in the circuit court’s order”
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue—essentially conceded that denial was correct.”
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue—essentially conceded that denial was correct.”
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue—essentially conceded that denial was correct.” (quoting Prince v. State, 40 So. 3d 11, 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010))
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue—essentially conceded that denial was correct.” (quoting Prince v. State, 40 So. 3d 11, 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Padovano, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.