Ninth Circuit· 8/24/2010
Price v. Stossel
Citations
- 620 F.3d 992
- 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17671
- 2010 WL 3307482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a proper analysis must compare the episode with the meaning of plaintiffs own words in the context of the presentation he actually delivered
- “To state a claim for implied defamation [under California law], * * * the published statement must reasonably ‘be understood as implying the alleged defamatory content.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Fisher, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2017-06-28· cited 392×
- Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupSecond Circuit· 2017-07-25· cited 143×
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-22· cited 79×
- Piping Rock Partners, Inc. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc.N.D. California· 2013-05-17· cited 47×
- Leah Manzari v. Associated NewspapersNinth Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 25×
- Corecivic, Inc. v. Candide Group, LLCNinth Circuit· 2022-08-30· cited 25×
- Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. County of San DiegoNinth Circuit· 2011-08-26· cited 23×
- Abbas v. Foreign Policy Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-27· cited 22×
- Walter Block v. New York Times CompanyFifth Circuit· 2017-08-15· cited 18×
- Boley v. Atlantic Monthly GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2013-06-25· cited 15×
- Wynn v. ChanosN.D. California· 2014-12-16· cited 14×
- Forras v. RaufDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-18· cited 7×
- SUULUTAAQ, INC. v. WilliamsD. Alaska· 2010-12-01· cited 5×
- Arenas v. Shed Media U.S. Inc.C.D. California· 2011-08-22· cited 3×
- Harkonen v. FlemingN.D. California· 2012-07-24· cited 2×
- Competitive Enterprise Institute and Rand Simberg v. Michael MannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13
- Rogers v. Hon MrozCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-12-08
- Balla v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-01-06
- Block v. New York Times Co.E.D. Louisiana· 2016-08-03
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 1,051×
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USANinth Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 720×
- Gardner v. MartinoNinth Circuit· 2009-04-24· cited 415×
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 304×
- Robert C. White v. Fraternal Order of PoliceD.C. Circuit· 1990-09-19· cited 219×
- Gilbert v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-26· cited 171×
- United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-09-10· cited 153×
- Crawford v. LungrenNinth Circuit· 1996-09-11· cited 149×
- Information Control Corporation v. Genesis One Computer Corporation, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1980-01-15· cited 147×
- Forsher v. BugliosiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 101×
- Partington v. BugliosiNinth Circuit· 1995-06-07· cited 70×
- Weller v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1991-07-18· cited 58×
- Vogel v. FeliceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-03-24· cited 56×
- Heuer v. KeeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-07-31· cited 48×
- Underwager v. Channel 9 AustraliaNinth Circuit· 1995-10-31· cited 38×
- Price v. StosselC.D. California· 2008-09-24· cited 3×
Other cases named Price v. Stossel
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.