· 8/24/2010
Price v. Stossel
Citations
- 620 F.3d 992
- 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17671
- 2010 WL 3307482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a proper analysis must compare the episode with the meaning of plaintiffs own words in the context of the presentation he actually delivered
- “To state a claim for implied defamation [under California law], * * * the published statement must reasonably ‘be understood as implying the alleged defamatory content.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Fisher, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.