Skip to main content
· 8/24/2010

Price v. Stossel

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 992
  • 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17671
  • 2010 WL 3307482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a proper analysis must compare the episode with the meaning of plaintiffs own words in the context of the presentation he actually delivered
  • “To state a claim for implied defamation [under California law], * * * the published statement must reasonably ‘be understood as implying the alleged defamatory content.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Fisher, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.