Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/24/2010

Price v. Stossel

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 992
  • 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17671
  • 2010 WL 3307482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a proper analysis must compare the episode with the meaning of plaintiffs own words in the context of the presentation he actually delivered
  • “To state a claim for implied defamation [under California law], * * * the published statement must reasonably ‘be understood as implying the alleged defamatory content.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Fisher, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Price v. Stossel

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.