Skip to main content

Price v. State

Citations

  • 825 S.E.2d 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that unless the record shows otherwise, we will presume that the trial judge properly exercised his discretion as the thirteenth juror
  • discussing that the trial judge will be presumed to have properly exercised his discretion as the thirteenth juror unless otherwise demonstrated by the record
  • explaining that unless the record shows otherwise, we will presume that the trial judge properly exercised his discretion as the thirteenth juror
  • rejecting appellant’s claim that trial court erred by failing to consider his motion for new trial on the “general grounds” because nothing in trial court’s order summarily denying defendant’s motion for new trial suggested it did not properly exercise its discretion
  • rejecting defendant’s claim of error that the trial court’s order failed to reflect that the trial court evaluated the credibility of the witnesses and weighed the evidence in deciding whether to exercise its discretion to grant a new trial in its role as the “thirteenth juror”
  • “Without having made such an evidentiary showing at the hearing, Appellant cannot demonstrate prejudice on his claim that counsel was ineffective. (Citations omitted.)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.