Price v. Illinois
Citations
- 238 U.S. 446
- 35 S. Ct. 892
- 59 L. Ed. 1400
- 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1577
Syllabus
<p>TKis court accepts the decision of the highest court of the State as to the construction of a pure food statute and whether specified articles are included within the prohibitions thereof, and then determines whether, as so construed, the statute is valid under the Federal Constitution.</p> <p>The police power of the State extends to imposing restrictions having reasonable relation to preserving the health of its people.</p> <p>The nature and extent Of such restrictions are matters for.legislative judgment in defining the policy of the State, and are within the power of the State unless palpably unreasonable and arbitrary.</p> <p>A prohibition against the sale of food preservatives containing boric acid is not so unreasonable and arbitrary as to amount to deprivation , of property without due process pf law.</p> <p>It is not enough to condemn a police statute as unconstitutional under the due process clause that the innocuousness of the prohibited article be debatable; for if debatable the legislature is entitled to its own judgment.</p> <p>In enacting a police statute the legislature is not limited to general directions,- but may prohibit the sale of such specific articles as it deems injurious.</p> <p>The legislature may estimate degrees of evil and adjust its legislation according to the existing exigency; and, without offending the equal protection provision of the Constitution, may prohibit the sale of particular articles — such as food preservatives containing boric acid — if it does not exceed bounds of reasonable classification.</p> <p>This court will not assume that goods are shipped from State to State in small retail packages, and where the character of the shipment is not shown, such packages cannot be classed with the “ original packages ” within the rule protecting such packages from subjection to the police laws of the State.</p> <p>In this case no question of the conflict of the state law with action by Congress’ in regard to interstate shipment o
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 1,175×
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 1,109×
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-01-31· cited 673×
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court· 1932-03-21· cited 589×
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 581×
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court· 1932-05-23· cited 480×
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 424×
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court· 1938-02-14· cited 260×
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 259×
- O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 202×
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court· 1929-05-20· cited 183×
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1925-04-17· cited 151×
- Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court· 1923-11-12· cited 143×
- First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court· 1924-04-07· cited 134×
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-01-08· cited 128×
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-11-06· cited 123×
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1940-01-15· cited 116×
- Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court· 1926-11-29· cited 93×
- Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 69×
- Biffer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court· 1917-04-19· cited 34×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1911-03-20· cited 1,717×
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 1,266×
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1827-03-12· cited 822×
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 388×
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1888-04-09· cited 387×
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1915-02-23· cited 223×
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court· 1908-11-02· cited 164×
- Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1900-12-03· cited 156×
- Schollenberger v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1898-05-23· cited 148×
- Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-03-13· cited 148×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 143×
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1896-11-30· cited 135×
- Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court· 1911-12-11· cited 133×
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 118×
- W. W. Cargill Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1901-03-05· cited 112×
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court· 1907-12-02· cited 105×
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court· 1902-01-06· cited 96×
- Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court· 1905-01-16· cited 85×
- Eberle v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1914-03-23· cited 58×
- Hammond Packing Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1914-04-13· cited 26×
Other cases named Price v. Illinois
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.