Skip to main content
· 3/5/2004

Pretzer v. Motor Vehicle Board

Citations

  • 138 S.W.3d 908
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 340
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 193
  • 2004 WL 422623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “neither legislative ratification nor judicial deference to an administrative interpretation can work a contradiction of plain statutory language”
  • holding that “neither legislative ratification nor judicial deference to an administrative interpretation can work a contradiction of plain statutory language”
  • ”[N]either legislative ratification nor judicial deference to an administrative interpretation can work a contradiction of plain statutory language.”
  • rejecting external factors in applying plain language of statute
  • “We are mindful of the rule that ‘[a] reviewing court is not bound by the reasons given by an agency in its order, provided there is a valid basis for the action taken by the agency.’” (quoting Texas Health Facilities Comm’n, 665 S.W.2d at 452-53)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.