Skip to main content
· 2/9/2009

Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement District

Citations

  • 597 F. Supp. 2d 1191
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “lack of 22 standing is a defect in subject-matter jurisdiction and may be properly challenged under 23 Rule 12(b)(1)”
  • “[I]f an existing party can adequately represent an absent party’s interest [in an existing action], then the absent party is not a necessary party under Rule 19(a)(1)(B).”
  • “[W]here a plaintiff seeks injunctive or declaratory relief and a third-party has an enforceable interest in the subject matter of the dispute, the court cannot grant complete relief in the third party’s absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry R. Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.