Hohider v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, if an employee is not a qualified individual, an employer’s engagement in the interactive process is unimportant
• holding that, if an employee is not a qualified individual, the employer’s “alleged failure to investigate into reasonable accommodation is unimportant”
• holding that a 100% healed policy violates the ADA if it has the effect of discriminating against an otherwise qualified individual with a disability
• holding that the requisite individualized assessment of whether class members are “qualified” under the ADA was “incompatible with the requirements of Rule 23 in this case[.]”
• holding the district court erred in using “pattern or practice” elements to define a discrimination claim
• holding the district court erred in using “pattern or practice” elements to define a discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).