Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/11/1987
Powell v. State
Citations
- 527 A.2d 276
- 1987 Del. LEXIS 1135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admitting expert’s testimony that alleged victims tell the truth in 99 percent of child sex abuse cases amounted to plain error
- finding plain error where an expert witness impugned the credibility of the defendant, thereby invading the province of the jury, and where the expert's particular testimony was \crucial” and a \substantial evidentiary factor” in the prosecution’s case
- finding plain error where an expert witness impugned the credibility of the defendant, thereby invading the province of the jury, and where the expert's particular testimony was \crucial\ and a \substantial evidentiary factor\ in the prosecution's case
- admission of expert testimony that 90 percent of child abuse victims were telling the truth was error
- admission of expert testimony that 90 percent of child abuse victims were telling the truth was error
- companion case holding that admitting expert’s testimony that alleged victims tell the truth in 99 percent of child sex abuse cases amounted to plain error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Yount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-12-08· cited 477×
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 202×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-10· cited 115×
- Kolberg v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 115×
- People v. JulianCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-04-29· cited 112×
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-06-11· cited 87×
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2007-01-30· cited 81×
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-03-27· cited 80×
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-07-27· cited 65×
- Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-06-22· cited 61×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- Moorhead v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-03-17· cited 16×
- State v. FloraySuperior Court of Delaware· 1997-07-07· cited 16×
- Doran v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-04-03· cited 15×
- Re v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-04-13· cited 14×
- Luttrell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-07-28· cited 14×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-05-14· cited 13×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-02-21· cited 430×
- United States v. Mark Kevin BinderNinth Circuit· 1985-08-22· cited 185×
- Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-03-17· cited 123×
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-06-11· cited 87×
- Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 42×
- Fensterer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-05-08· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.