Powell v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• actual possession is required to connect defendant to drugs
• aetual possession is required to connect defendant to drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Houston v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 105×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Commonwealth v. Sawhill
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1983-11-23· cited 310×
• Sanders v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-09-27· cited 135×
• O'Bryan v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1982-03-09· cited 83×
• Moore v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1982-06-15· cited 55×
• Hargrave v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 17×
• Bowling v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1955-05-06· cited 14×
• Rupard v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1971-10-29· cited 13×
• Shepherd v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1989-08-04· cited 3×