· 2/7/2024
Pourabdollah v. Blinken
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of relief on similar grounds where 39 of 78 potential jurors (50 percent) were excluded as potentially partial
- affirming denial of relief on similar grounds where 39 of 78 potential jurors (50 percent) were excluded as potentially partial
- addressing and rejecting on direct appeal Petitioner’s argument that the district judge should have recused himself from the criminal case
- No prejudice where 50% of veniremen were excused because they could not be impartial
- disqualification required only where judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned or she has a personal bias or prejudice
- a legally sufficient affidavit is required to disqualify a judge from hearing a case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Dabney L. Friedrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.