Skip to main content
· 9/3/1999

In Re United Mine Workers of America International Union

Citations

  • 190 F.3d 545
  • 338 U.S. App. D.C. 56
  • 1999 CCH OSHD 31,908
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21058
  • 1999 WL 682956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an OMB review requirement is no excuse to miss a statutory deadline
  • finding that ordering an 14 agency to conclude a rulemaking could \do more harm than good\ where it would displace 15 other rulemakings the parties agreed were of greater significance to health and safety
  • assessing welfare by examining whether the regulatory scheme was “negatively impacting a significant risk of material impairment”
  • ordering an agency to produce a schedule in response to a mandamus petition and retaining jurisdiction
  • rejecting argument that the OMB review provision of the executive order excused party's failure to meet a statutory deadline
  • declining to issue a writ of mandamus compelling an agency to conclude rulemaking to avoid setting agency’s regulatory agenda but retaining jurisdiction to ensure the agency does so in a timely manner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Tatel, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.