Ninth Circuit· 10/10/2008
Potter v. Hughes
Citations
- 546 F.3d 1051
- 71 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1333
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21306
- 2008 WL 4531393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Supreme Court precedent is clear that we 23 may choose among threshold grounds for denying audience to a case on the merits.” (cleaned up)
- “In this case, the issue of whether Potter satisfied the demand pleading requirements of Rule 23.1 is ‘logically antecedent’ to the issue of whether we have jurisdiction over this action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Gould, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- John Cottrell v. Michael DukeEighth Circuit· 2013-12-18· cited 108×
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. WynnNinth Circuit· 2016-07-18· cited 79×
- In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court· 2009-05-22· cited 73×
- Willa Rosenbloom v. David PyottNinth Circuit· 2014-09-02· cited 65×
- Quinn v. Anvil Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 64×
- In re Facebook, Inc.Second Circuit· 2015-07-24· cited 63×
- Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities LLCNinth Circuit· 2010-12-02· cited 24×
- Clifford Tindall v. First Solar Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-06-13· cited 18×
- Unión De Empleados De Muelles De Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan v. UBS Financial Services Inc.First Circuit· 2013-01-04· cited 11×
- In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative LitigationE.D. California· 2017-06-30· cited 9×
- In re Polycom, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-01-13· cited 6×
- Laborers' Local v. IntersilN.D. California· 2012-03-07· cited 5×
- Haith ex rel. Accretive Health, Inc. v. BronfmanN.D. Illinois· 2013-03-01· cited 5×
- Uche-Uwakwe v. ShinsekiC.D. California· 2013-09-18· cited 5×
- Murdoch v. CastroNinth Circuit· 2008-10-09· cited 2×
- ATTACHMATE CORP. v. Public Health TrustW.D. Washington· 2010-01-13· cited 2×
- Lake Associates, LLC v. DNZ Products LLCD. Oregon· 2012-08-20· cited 2×
- In Re HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc., Derivative LitigationW.D. Washington· 2011-11-28· cited 1×
- Vanessa Simmonds v. Credit Suisse SecuritiesNinth Circuit· 2010-12-02
- Vanessa Simmonds v. Credit Suisse SecuritiesNinth Circuit· 2011-01-18
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 2,468×
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 2,209×
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,930×
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 1,302×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,235×
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-09· cited 877×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 794×
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 776×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 713×
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 488×
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 379×
- Telxon Corporation v. MeyersonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-06-07· cited 135×
Other cases named Potter v. Hughes
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.