Posco v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining in part Commerce’s countervailing duty investigation of cold-rolled steel flat products from Korea
• \That the facts merited the use of an adverse inference does not necessarily mean that those same facts merited selection of the highest rate.\
• \[ Section] 1677e(d)(2) contemplates the selection of the highest rate when the situation merits the highest rate.... Commerce failed to evaluate whether the circumstances in this case merited the highest rate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Posco v. United States

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2018-12-06· cited 7×
• Posco v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2020-10-15· cited 7×
• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2019-05-01· cited 2×
• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2019-05-20· cited 1×
• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2019-11-08
• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2025-08-08
• POSCO v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2026-04-17