Essar Steel Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he agency then attempts to use information provided by the individual respondent companies regarding the benefit, if any, conferred by the particular program.”
• “Regardless of whether [the respondent] deemed the information relevant, it nonetheless should have produced it [in] the event that Commerce reached a different conclusion…”
• respondent “should have produced” information it deemed irrelevant in “the event that Commerce reached a different conclusion”
• AFA merited when respondent withheld requested information on the basis of its belief that the information was irrelevant to Commerce's CVD determination
• “[w]here the foreign government fails to act to the best of its ability, Commerce will usually find that the government has provided a financial contribution to a specific industry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).