District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/21/2013

Portillo v. United States

Citations

62 A.3d 1243
2013 WL 1338937
2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the trial court “shall make finding of fact on the record sufficient to allow meaningful appellate review”
stating that the trial court “shall make finding of fact on the record sufficient to allow meaningful appellate review”
no plain error where, in a burglary case, the government argued an entry-with-intent-to-steal theory of liability as charged, as opposed to the additional entry-with-intent-to-assault theory added by trial court in jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburne, Glickman, Oberly, Rigsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Portillo v. United States

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.