District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/21/1978
Farrell v. United States
Citations
- 391 A.2d 755
- 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure to interview a number of witnesses and not to meet with client until a few days before trial would be constitutionally deficient
- holding failure to interview a number of witnesses and not to meet with client until a few days before trial would be constitutionally deficient
- reversing conviction where trial court failed to inquire into substitution request without examining harmfulness of error
- requiring inquiry when defendant alleges ineffective assistance of counsel
- requiring inquiry when defendant alleges ineffective assistance of counsel
- pretrial assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Gallagher, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)D.C. Circuit· 1979-07-10· cited 324×
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 98×
- Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-13· cited 91×
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-07· cited 80×
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-01-26· cited 45×
- Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 43×
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-04-29· cited 39×
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-15· cited 36×
- Codrington v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-07-20· cited 34×
- Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-09-09· cited 29×
- State v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-10-22· cited 28×
- Pierce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-12· cited 28×
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-26· cited 24×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-17· cited 21×
- Moctar v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-09-03· cited 21×
- Southall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 21×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-09-29· cited 20×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-03-14· cited 18×
- In re B. K. C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-01-09· cited 18×
- Portillo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-03-21· cited 17×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1966-07-28· cited 256×
- United States v. Joseph CalabroSecond Circuit· 1972-09-21· cited 215×
- Alfred Coles v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1968-01-08· cited 169×
- Barham v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 152×
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-18· cited 120×
- United States ex rel. Martinez v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1975-12-08· cited 49×
- Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-04-11· cited 27×
- Ford v. WainwrightFifth Circuit· 1976-02-04· cited 22×
- United States v. Louis Albert Woods, A/K/A Rashid Wood, A/K/A Milton WoodardFifth Circuit· 1973-12-07· cited 18×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Jimmy X. Spencer v. Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterSeventh Circuit· 1977-02-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.