Skip to main content
· 5/25/2000

Clayborne v. United States

Citations

  • 751 A.2d 956
  • 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 124
  • 2000 WL 675906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the standard for bias cross-examination is \a good faith basis\ 3 and that the requirement is \flexible as well as lenient\
  • reversal is not required if “we can say with the requisite ‘fair assurance’ that [the appellant] was not substantially prejudiced by the trial court’s [error]-”
  • “[Pjrobative evidence of bias, like probative evidence generally, should not be excluded because of ‘crabbed notions of relevance or excessive mistrust of juries.’ ”
  • alternatively describing the requirement for a good faith basis as \a reasonable factual foundation\ and \at least a well-reasoned suspicion\
  • “[A] party’s effort to demonstrate bias may properly solicit over a wide range any information of potential value to the trier of fact in the assessment of credibility.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “The examiner must have a reasonable factual foundation, such as the credible report of another witness or one‟s client, or at least a „well-reasoned suspicion‟ that the circumstances indicating bias might be true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Reid, Glickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.