Porter v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons so long as there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record”
• stating that “the tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that reaches the right result, but for 24 the wrong reasons so long as there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chakra 5 v. City of Miami Beach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-22· cited 13×
• Smith v. Agency for Health Care Administration
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-23· cited 12×
• Delivorias v. Delivorias
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-12· cited 8×
• Miami-Dade Expressway Authority v. Tropical Trailer Leasing
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-27
• Elisamuel Caballero-Quinones v. Kyle T. Wilder, Wilder Outdoors LLC and Sheriff Grady C. Judd in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Polk County, Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-02-04· cited 471×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 241×
• State, Dept. of Revenue Ex Rel. Rochell v. Morris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-27· cited 11×
• Amir v. Gannon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-28· cited 2×
• Ingrahm v. Ingrahm
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 2×
• Drumwright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-11· cited 1×