Skip to main content
· 5/27/1999

State, Dept. of Revenue Ex Rel. Rochell v. Morris

Citations

  • 736 So. 2d 41
  • 1999 WL 334754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while in some circumstances the tipsy coachman doctrine may apply, affirmance based on this doctrine must be supported by evidence in the record
  • noting that while in some circumstances the tipsy coachman doctrine may apply, affirmance based on this doctrine must be supported by evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.