Illinois Supreme Court· 10/17/1980
Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.
Citations
- 412 N.E.2d 518
- 82 Ill. 2d 203
- 45 Ill. Dec. 167
- 1980 Ill. LEXIS 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to give effect to loan agreement to extent that it would have allowed double recovery
- Held: When a pretrial loan agreement is executed before judgment, then the plaintiffs recovery from the nonset-tling defendant is reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any double recovery, taking into account the repayment provisions of the agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kluczynski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pasquale v. Speed Products EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-08-10· cited 165×
- Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 156×
- Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 103×
- Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-03-27· cited 59×
- Hentze v. UnverfehrtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-30· cited 45×
- Klier v. SiegelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-07-24· cited 37×
- Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago Ex Rel. O'Keeffe v. Ingram Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-04· cited 36×
- Benge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 29×
- Fultz v. PeartAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-09· cited 28×
- Dremco, Inc. v. Hartz Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-12· cited 25×
- In Re Marriage of VucicAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-07-15· cited 24×
- Mazanek v. Rockford Drop Forge Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-04· cited 24×
- Brown v. Timpte Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-01· cited 22×
- Dick v. GursoyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-07-20· cited 22×
- Danny Stifle v. Marathon Petroleum Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Insulating & Materials Corporation, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1989-06-26· cited 21×
- Foster v. KanuriAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-08· cited 20×
- Nguyen v. TilwalliAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-07· cited 19×
- J. F. Equipment, Inc. v. Owatonna Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-04-22· cited 15×
- Eberle v. BrennerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-02-10· cited 12×
- Harriss v. ElliottAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-01-15· cited 12×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kerns v. EngelkeIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 196×
- Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 118×
- Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 112×
- Schek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1969-03-27· cited 110×
- Rucker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 110×
- Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1960-01-22· cited 106×
- Gatto v. Walgreen Drug Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-09-26· cited 79×
- Jackson v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court· 1953-09-24· cited 71×
- Casson v. NashIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-12-04· cited 50×
- Harris v. Algonquin Ready Mix, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1974-11-27· cited 49×
- Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RR Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-05-26· cited 41×
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. American Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1951-01-18· cited 35×
- O'CALLAGHAN v. Waller & Beckwith Realty Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-11-26· cited 35×
- McFadden v. St. Paul Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1914-04-23· cited 16×
- Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-23· cited 6×
Other cases named Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.