· 10/17/1980
Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.
Citations
- 412 N.E.2d 518
- 82 Ill. 2d 203
- 45 Ill. Dec. 167
- 1980 Ill. LEXIS 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to give effect to loan agreement to extent that it would have allowed double recovery
- Held: When a pretrial loan agreement is executed before judgment, then the plaintiffs recovery from the nonset-tling defendant is reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any double recovery, taking into account the repayment provisions of the agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kluczynski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.