Skip to main content
· 10/17/1980

Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.

Citations

  • 412 N.E.2d 518
  • 82 Ill. 2d 203
  • 45 Ill. Dec. 167
  • 1980 Ill. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to give effect to loan agreement to extent that it would have allowed double recovery
  • Held: When a pretrial loan agreement is executed before judgment, then the plaintiffs recovery from the nonset-tling defendant is reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any double recovery, taking into account the repayment provisions of the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.