Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Illinois Supreme Court· 8/10/1995

Pasquale v. Speed Products Engineering

Citations

  • 654 N.E.2d 1365
  • 166 Ill. 2d 337
  • 211 Ill. Dec. 314
  • 1995 Ill. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rickey did not alter impact rule for bystander plaintiffs in strict liability cases
  • recognizing that courts should not impose a setoff against a recovery from injuries separate and distinct from those for which the plaintiff was already compensated through settlement
  • holding that Rickey did not alter impact rule for bystander plaintiffs in strict liability cases
  • holding that emotioned damages are not recoverable in strict liability and that the plaintiff failed to satisfy the physical impact requirement of the bystander rule
  • recognizing that courts should not impose a setoff against a recovery from injuries separate and distinct from those for which the plaintiff was already compensated through settlement
  • holding that the Act \should be strictly construed\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman, McMorrow, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pasquale v. Speed Products Engineering

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.