Skip to main content
· 1/22/1960

Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.

Citations

  • 165 N.E.2d 286
  • 18 Ill. 2d 538
  • 1960 Ill. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that violation of plumbing and sewage disposal routing requirements breached implied warranty
  • holding that city code provisions regarding drainage and connections for water and sewer service were deemed to be part of contract for sale of real estate and building to be constructed thereon and that failure to comply with code provisions was tantamount to breach of contract
  • holding that city code provisions regarding drainage and connections for water and sewer service were deemed to be part of contract for sale of real estate and building to be constructed thereon and that failure to comply with code provisions was tantamount to breach of contract
  • “It is settled that all contracts for the purchase and sale of realty are presumed to have been executed in the light of existing law ***.”
  • “It is settled that all contracts for the purchase and sale of realty are presumed to have been executed in the light of existing law ***.”
  • “the law existing at the time and place of the making of the contract is deemed a part of the contract, as though expressly referred to or incorporated in it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bristow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.