Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Woolsey & Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the law-of-the-case doctrine did not prevent the panel from reconsidering a motions panel’s application of res judicata to a relevant state-court decision
• collecting cases for the proposition that the preclusive effect of arbitrability rulings turns on what they determine and not whether they are interlocutory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).