Skip to main content
· 2/17/1978

PMH PROPERTIES v. Nichols

Citations

  • 263 N.W.2d 799
  • 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dual agency \is not per se against public policy\ and \would not be impermissible as a matter of law\
  • agency requires both manifestation by principal that agent is acting on its behalf, and a right of principal to control agent
  • agency requires both manifestation by principal that agent is acting on its behalf, and a right of principal to control agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran, Kelly, Yetka, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.