Security Savings Bank v. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \it is questionable whether Minn. Stat. § 609.53 applies where there has been no criminal prosecution for theft.\
• denying summary judgment on civil theft claim because “there is no evidence of intent as required by the statute,” and noting, “In addition, it is questionable whether Minn. Stat. § 509.53 applies where there has been no criminal prosecution for theft.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).