Tenth Circuit· 9/1/2000

Plotner v. AT & T Corp.

Citations

224 F.3d 1161
44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1330
2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5100
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22398
2000 WL 1234849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that fraud on the court “refers to misrepresentation direct[ly] affecting the judicial process, not simply the non-disclosure to one party of facts known by another”
explaining that a court can take judicial notice of calendar and days of week on which certain dates fall
explaining that the court did not have to decide whether claims were core or non-core because \that determination has no effect on the dispositive issue of res judicata\
taking judicial notice of the days of the week upon which relevant dates fell
noting a lack of authority “for the proposition that fraud on the court . . . allow[s] a collateral attack on a judgment . . . particularly considering that Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b
explaining the Tenth Circuit has adopted the Restatement (Second) of Judgment’s transactional approach to defining “cause of action” and thus bars “all claims or legal theories of recovery that .arise from the same transaction, event, or occurrence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Anderson, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.