Plotner v. AT & T Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud on the court “refers to misrepresentation direct[ly] affecting the judicial process, not simply the non-disclosure to one party of facts known by another”
• explaining that a court can take judicial notice of calendar and days of week on which certain dates fall
• explaining that the court did not have to decide whether claims were core or non-core because \that determination has no effect on the dispositive issue of res judicata\
• taking judicial notice of the days of the week upon which relevant dates fell
• noting a lack of authority “for the proposition that fraud on the court . . . allow[s] a collateral attack on a judgment . . . particularly considering that Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b
• explaining the Tenth Circuit has adopted the Restatement (Second) of Judgment’s transactional approach to defining “cause of action” and thus bars “all claims or legal theories of recovery that .arise from the same transaction, event, or occurrence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).