The Petromanagement Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Acme-Thomas Joint Venture and J.L. Thomas Engineering, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would “effectively circumvent the judge’s discretion to deny untimely motions to consolidate” where the defendant’s “motion to consolidate came on the eve of trial and more than fifteen months after filing the initial complaint”
• adopting the Restatement (Second) of Judgments §§ 24-25 (1982) in determining what constitutes a single cause of action for res judicata purposes in the Tenth Circuit
• adopting the Restatement (Second) of Judgments §§ 24-25 (1982) in determining what constitutes a single cause of action for res judicata purposes in the Tenth Circuit
• adopting the Restatement (Second) of Judgments §§ 24-25 (1982) 15 in determining what constitutes a single cause of action for res judicata purposes in 16 the Tenth Circuit
• articulating the standard for a “full and fair opportunity to litigate”
• articulating the standard for a \full and fair opportunity to litigate\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).