Tenth Circuit· 10/26/2005

MACTEC, Inc. v. Gorelick

Citations

427 F.3d 821
77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1097
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23135
2005 WL 2767135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the parties’ intent to waive appellate review of the district court’s judgment on the arbitration award must be “clear and unequivocal”
holding that parties may limit right to appeal from federal district court’s judgment confirming or vacating award, but expressing doubt that provision restricting any judicial review would be enforceable
holding that parties agreed to waive right to appeal judgment rendered on any arbitration award by agreeing that “[j]udgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator shall be final and nonappealable”
holding that “contractual provisions limiting the right to appeal from a district court’s judgment confirming or vacating an arbitration award are permissible, so long as the intent to do so is clear and unequivocal”
explaining that a district court’s denial of a motion to vacate an arbitration award was a resolution on the merits
affirming district court’s dismissal with prejudice of declaratory judgment action as res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.