Skip to main content
· 10/26/2005

MACTEC, Inc. v. Gorelick

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 821
  • 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1097
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23135
  • 2005 WL 2767135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the parties’ intent to waive appellate review of the district court’s judgment on the arbitration award must be “clear and unequivocal”
  • holding that parties may limit right to appeal from federal district court’s judgment confirming or vacating award, but expressing doubt that provision restricting any judicial review would be enforceable
  • holding that parties agreed to waive right to appeal judgment rendered on any arbitration award by agreeing that “[j]udgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator shall be final and nonappealable”
  • holding that “contractual provisions limiting the right to appeal from a district court’s judgment confirming or vacating an arbitration award are permissible, so long as the intent to do so is clear and unequivocal”
  • explaining that a district court’s denial of a motion to vacate an arbitration award was a resolution on the merits
  • affirming district court’s dismissal with prejudice of declaratory judgment action as res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.