Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/24/1984
Platt v. Platt
Citations
- 485 A.2d 250
- 302 Md. 9
- 1984 Md. LEXIS 406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a motion to revise an enrolled divorce decree because of a discrepancy between the separation agreement and the decree, filed more than 5 years after entry of the enrolled decree, was properly denied.
- describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as “firmly established” and stating that, “for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have ‘unrestricted discretion’ to revise it.”
- describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as \firmly established\ and stating that, \for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have `unrestricted discretion' to revise it.\
- describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as “firmly established” and stating that, “for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have ‘unrestricted discretion’ to revise it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-25· cited 80×
- Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-07· cited 69×
- Lieberman v. LiebermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-06· cited 32×
- Maryland Board of Nursing v. NechayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-15· cited 28×
- Early v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-23· cited 21×
- Mendelson v. MendelsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-09· cited 19×
- Andresen v. AndresenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-10-10· cited 19×
- J.T. Masonry Co. v. Oxford Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-13· cited 16×
- Autobahn Motors, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-09· cited 15×
- Davis v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-09· cited 13×
- Kleban v. Eghrari-SabetCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-06· cited 13×
- Thacker v. HaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-05· cited 13×
- Skok v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-07· cited 7×
- Shapiro v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 6×
- Leadroot v. LeadrootCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-06· cited 5×
- De Arriz v. Klingler-De ArrizCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-01· cited 1×
- Andersen v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-10-10
- Velasquez v. FuentesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-26
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-06-06
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court· 1961-05-22· cited 348×
- Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-27· cited 39×
- Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-26· cited 34×
- Maryland Lumber Co. v. Savoy Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-09-19· cited 29×
- Bebermeyer v. BebermeyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-12-27· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.