Skip to main content

Platt v. Platt

Citations

  • 485 A.2d 250
  • 302 Md. 9
  • 1984 Md. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a motion to revise an enrolled divorce decree because of a discrepancy between the separation agreement and the decree, filed more than 5 years after entry of the enrolled decree, was properly denied.
  • describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as “firmly established” and stating that, “for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have ‘unrestricted discretion’ to revise it.”
  • describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as \firmly established\ and stating that, \for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have `unrestricted discretion' to revise it.\
  • describing the law governing the power of a court over an enrolled decree as “firmly established” and stating that, “for a period of thirty days from the entry of a law or equity judgment a circuit court shall have ‘unrestricted discretion’ to revise it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.