Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/23/1995
Early v. Early
Citations
- 338 Md. 639
- 659 A.2d 1334
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an irregularity existed because the clerk failed to send copies of the court order to all the parties
- irregularity for vacating judgment defined as “failure to follow required process or procedure” in the conduct of a suit; irregularity consisted of clerk’s failure to send copy of order terminating child support to child support recovery unit in violation of civil procedure rule
- FL § 1-201 confers subject matter jurisdiction over specified cases
- reviewing the circuit court’s child support order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-09· cited 143×
- Scott v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-14· cited 90×
- Powell v. BreslinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-01-18· cited 44×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Ben Lewis Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-27· cited 15×
- Radcliff v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-21· cited 14×
- Costello v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-09-18· cited 13×
- Davis v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-09· cited 13×
- Thacker v. HaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-05· cited 13×
- Rolley v. SanfordCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-12· cited 11×
- Gruss v. GrussCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-01· cited 9×
- Kalman v. FusteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-05· cited 8×
- CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION v. ShehanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-23· cited 5×
- Spangler v. McQuittyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-01-27· cited 4×
- Huntley v. HuntleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-01· cited 3×
- Vito v. KlausmeyerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-04· cited 1×
- Velasquez v. FuentesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-26
- In the Matter of D.M.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-07-30
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 173×
- Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-16· cited 73×
- Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-07· cited 69×
- Carroll County Department of Social Services v. EdelmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-30· cited 61×
- Wooddy v. WooddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-13· cited 36×
- Maryland Lumber Co. v. Savoy Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-09-19· cited 29×
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-08· cited 25×
- Ottwell v. OttwellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-15· cited 25×
- Platt v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-12-24· cited 24×
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-05-21· cited 24×
- Woodham v. WoodhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-06-26· cited 19×
- J.T. Masonry Co. v. Oxford Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-13· cited 16×
- Autobahn Motors, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-09· cited 15×
- Billman v. Maryland Deposit Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-28· cited 14×
- Hardy v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-07-05· cited 14×
- Abb v. CrossfieldCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-21· cited 12×
- Terry v. TerryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-13· cited 11×
- Flood v. FloodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-23· cited 11×
- Schnicke v. SchnickeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-17· cited 10×
- Gatuso v. GatusoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-26· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.