Skip to main content

Pizzo v. State

Citations

  • 910 So. 2d 287
  • 2005 WL 1705237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence was insufficient to prove mortgage fraud as there was no evidence that defendant made any fraudulent or false representations to any named victim or that named victims relied on any false or fraudulent representations made by defendant
  • reasoning that the State did not establish reliance when there was no evidence the defendant had any contact with the victim/customer and the customer only signed the defendant’s fraudulent forms after a third party’s misrepresentations and omissions regarding the forms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.