Skaggs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining, in dicta, that trial court’s pronouncement reserving jurisdiction for sixty days to determine whether to impose restitution was sufficient to reserve jurisdiction to make such determination sixty-three days later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pearson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-03· cited 28×
• Nguyen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 23×
• Baldwin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-30· cited 13×
• Pizzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 11×
• Marinelli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 10×
• Harth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-28· cited 2×
• Hummell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-09· cited 2×
• Frazier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-27· cited 1×
• State v. Witthaus
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 1×
• Marcus Kahkonen v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-30
• D.A.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-02
• Kahkonen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-16
• Smallwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Buchman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-02-21· cited 44×
• Haas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-19· cited 31×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-04· cited 18×
• Gatlin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-12· cited 11×
• Haas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-27· cited 8×