K.D. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when multiple offenses constitute the basis for a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense
• holding that when multiple offenses constitute the basis for a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-09· cited 13×
• Pizzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 11×
• J.A.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-24· cited 5×
• Fuller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 3×
• J.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 3×
• KD v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-27
• JAL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-24
• JW v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06
• V.A.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18
• D.D.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-28
• E.D.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-12
• CHIQUITA LASHAE MCGEE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-05-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ulrich v. EATON VANCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 14×
• Bernstein v. Berrin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-11· cited 12×
• E.Y. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-20· cited 12×
• Marinelli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 10×
• Colson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-13· cited 8×
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-21· cited 7×