Supreme Court of Georgia· 1/12/2004
Pittman v. State
Citations
- 592 S.E.2d 72
- 277 Ga. 475
- 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 210
- 2004 Ga. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the detective’s “urg[ing] Pittman to tell the truth so that he could ‘work this’” was not an impermissible hope of benefit
- holding that the interviewing detective’s urging the suspect to tell the truth so that the detective could work with his information and try to help him was not an impermissible hope of benefit
- finding Ritter inapposite, where, among other reasons, no misrepresentations were made about the victim’s status
- “The detective’s suggestion that [the accused] may not have intended to kill the victim did not amount to a hope of benefit.”
- the “detective “plainly told [the accused] that he could not promise him anything other than that he would relate [the accused’s] version of events”
- officer’s suggestions that defendant had not intended to kill victim did not offer improper hope of benefit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Devega v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-02-01· cited 56×
- Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-06-25· cited 39×
- Flanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-02-21· cited 33×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-06-30· cited 24×
- Stinski v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-02· cited 22×
- Peacock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-07· cited 21×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-05-05· cited 19×
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-09-12· cited 17×
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-05-04· cited 15×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-12-23· cited 13×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-27· cited 11×
- Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-23· cited 5×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-01-28· cited 3×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-18· cited 2×
- State v. MunozCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-02· cited 1×
- State v. Miguel MunozCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-02
- Merkeith Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-23
- Connie Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-23
- Bo Dukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-09-02
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-09-15· cited 421×
- Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-29· cited 406×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-11-22· cited 98×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-07-06· cited 90×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-01· cited 83×
- State v. RitterSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-09· cited 45×
- Carranza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-02-19· cited 43×
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-05· cited 42×
- Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-02-11· cited 41×
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-09· cited 38×
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-02· cited 37×
- Horton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-09-07· cited 29×
- Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-05-05· cited 18×
- Wiley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.