Skip to main content

Pittman v. State

Citations

  • 592 S.E.2d 72
  • 277 Ga. 475
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 210
  • 2004 Ga. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the detective’s “urg[ing] Pittman to tell the truth so that he could ‘work this’” was not an impermissible hope of benefit
  • holding that the interviewing detective’s urging the suspect to tell the truth so that the detective could work with his information and try to help him was not an impermissible hope of benefit
  • finding Ritter inapposite, where, among other reasons, no misrepresentations were made about the victim’s status
  • “The detective’s suggestion that [the accused] may not have intended to kill the victim did not amount to a hope of benefit.”
  • the “detective “plainly told [the accused] that he could not promise him anything other than that he would relate [the accused’s] version of events”
  • officer’s suggestions that defendant had not intended to kill victim did not offer improper hope of benefit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.